The Export Facilitation Scheme remained under criticism following reactions to the Federal Budget 2026–27. Representatives from the trading community argued that their proposals received limited attention during the budget process.
The Export Facilitation Scheme became a key concern as stakeholders raised questions regarding oversight, competition, and implications for government revenue collection.
PCDMA Opposes Export Facilitation Scheme
Pakistan Chemicals and Dyes Merchants Association expressed disappointment over the Federal Budget 2026–27 and its treatment of concerns raised by commercial importers.
Chairman Salim Valimuhammad stated that the association had advocated ending the Export Facilitation Scheme.
According to his statement, the continuation of the policy without additional safeguards may increase imbalance between industrial and commercial importers.
He maintained that commercial traders expected stronger policy adjustments in the latest budget.
For more: Arif Baloch Birthday Celebration Held In Karachi With Ronaldo Jersey
Salim Valimuhammad Raises Import Concerns
Salim Valimuhammad stated that certain goods imported under industrial concessions are allegedly entering commercial markets.
According to his remarks, some importers reportedly obtain industrial benefits and later sell products commercially.
He argued that this situation creates competitive pressure for businesses that comply with full customs and tax requirements.
He further stated that such practices may influence both market conditions and public revenue collection.
Commercial Importers Seek Equal Competition
The discussion around the Export Facilitation Scheme also focused on market fairness and regulatory oversight.
PCDMA argued that commercial importers continue to meet full taxation and duty obligations while some concessionary mechanisms receive limited monitoring.
The association called for stronger implementation systems and clearer accountability measures.
According to the statement, equal treatment across stakeholders remains important for sustainable economic activity.
Federal Budget Business Community Response
Commenting on broader fiscal measures, the association stated that relief appeared more visible for salaried groups than for businesses.
PCDMA maintained that commercial activity requires stronger incentives and a more supportive policy environment.
The association also stated that taxation levels remain a challenge for many businesses.
According to the chairman, the current framework offers limited encouragement for expanding commercial operations.
Export Facilitation Scheme Monitoring Demand
PCDMA urged policymakers to establish stronger checks and balances related to concessionary import programs.
The association stated that facilities intended for industrial production should remain aligned with their stated purpose.
It emphasized that effective oversight could support fair competition and strengthen revenue outcomes.
The group also warned that unresolved market distortions may continue creating challenges for commercial importers and broader economic activity.
