Karachi — Actor Sabeena Farooq has sparked debate on social media after questioning whether public servants should stop performing their duties if they do not support the ruling political party.
Pakistan, China Sign Three MoUs to Boost Water, Agriculture and Tea Industry Cooperation
Her remarks came in response to a viral video involving former television host-turned-politician Iqrar ul Hassan, who was seen confronting an immigration officer at Lahore airport following an alleged exchange during an immigration queue.
In an Instagram story posted on Monday, Farooq questioned whether Hassan expected government employees who did not vote for those in power to “sit at home,” or whether they were required to “worship whoever was in power.” She further argued that in democratic countries such as the United States, public services continue regardless of political differences.
The actor also criticised Hassan’s conduct, stating that someone who often “preaches peace and calm” during Ramadan should not use his influence in such a manner. She described his behaviour toward the officer as “unacceptable” and questioned the use of personal power and fame in public confrontations.
In the video that triggered the debate, Hassan can be seen confronting a Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) immigration officer, accusing him of making a disparaging remark referencing singer-turned-politician Jawad Ahmed. The officer denied addressing Hassan and asked him not to escalate the situation.
Hassan is heard demanding accountability from the official, insisting that public servants must remain neutral and not express political opinions while on duty. The exchange escalated as he questioned the officer’s conduct and called for an apology, while bystanders gathered at the scene, with mixed reactions from passengers and staff.
The situation briefly intensified before immigration staff and others attempted to de-escalate tensions, after which Hassan left the area.
Later, Hassan issued a statement on social media explaining that the incident occurred while he was returning from a family trip abroad. He said he initially refrained from publicising the matter to avoid jeopardising the officer’s job, but decided to share his version after claiming he faced misinformation from political circles, including the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf.
He also raised questions about whether similar comments directed at opposition figures would be considered acceptable, while stating that many witnesses supported his reaction during the incident.
The exchange has since ignited a wider debate online about professional conduct of public servants, political neutrality, and the use of social media influence in public disputes.
